The main point I was trying to make is that the infantry have little feedback from the officers as to their performance. Also, there is no currently accepted channel available for the infantry to provide feedback to the officers as to the officer performance. I suggested a post-match "debriefing" where it was possible for both the officers and the infantry to kind of "exchange notes", but this was ignored.

Personally, I think that improved communication between officers and infantry can only be of benefit to the corp as a whole. We all have lives outside the game and many of the skills that we have acquired over the course of our lives can be of benefit to the corp. The benefits of these skills can only be leveraged through communication.

Let me provide a brief example... PC.

I'm pretty sure that none of us expected to maintain our foothold for long, but thanks to the swiftness in the actions of peg and star, we acquired a region straight away. We fought well for that region and eventually lost it. I don't see this as a loss, I see this as a victory in both experience and knowledge. In the first battle we were outnumbered, outgunned, out-skilled and out-trained, but we still managed to hold an objective to the end. The second battle was less successful, but we put up a good fight and avoided a redline.

The officers had a post-match "debriefing" after each of these battles (apparently) and made decisions based on our performance, however nothing of the results of these discussions was passed on to the infantry. We fought for the corp mostly expecting to lose, but with the possibility of success motivating us to fight on. We didn't expect hugs, kisses, cute toys and conciliatory notes when we lost, but we didn't expect to be ignored either.

Even if the loss can be mostly attributed to "they had better gear than us", this is a poor summary of the battle. We did many things right that would have gone better if we had better gear, we did things wrong that would still have resulted in a lack of success if we had better gear. "They had better gear than us" is true, but is a cop-out. "They got to the compound before us" is true, but when they did we were in complete disarray and had no fallback position.

Star has said that "too much information confuses them". This is completely insulting to people who manage far more information than a basic battle plan with a couple of contingencies on a daily basis as a part of their professional careers. It is a poor reason for not properly formulating a battle plan. If you do have a properly formulated plan then tell us. If you want us to "trust the officers" then show us that they are trustworthy.

I don't think I'm alone in wanting more than "Trust The Officers" as a response when I ask what can be done to improve the corp's performance. We are a team... All of us. I would like it if the officers could acknowledge this.

But back to my original point...

Communication is important. From the officers to the infantry, but also from the infantry to the officers. The infantry have a lot to give, in addition to our time and our suits. Feedback (both ways) following a momentous battle would be beneficial to both the infantry and the officers (not to mention the corp as a whole through providing a community spirit).

One possible way of achieving this is a "debriefing", which I visualize as an informal after-match discussion between the whole team. The infantry can give feedback on officer de

So... why did you post this and why do you think anyone would care about a 15 man corp? o . 0

But regardless sounds like some tough times, least the infantry understand communication is important - always a good first step lol

Wait.

You gave money to a group called T-SCAM?

+1 qft